SesenGPT Life Sciences Benchmark Program

Benchmark Your Life Sciences Translation Quality, Costs, and Efficiency

See how SesenGPT compares with your existing translation process through an evidence-based evaluation using representative clinical, regulatory, and technical content.

Assess translation accuracy, terminology, human review effort, turnaround, and total cost using quality requirements that matter to your organization.

Request a Benchmark Evaluation See How It Works

Evaluate new capabilities without replacing your existing provider.

Pharmaceuticals · Biotechnology · Medical Devices · CROs

Your Benchmark Findings

See the Results Behind Your Translation Decisions

A useful benchmark goes beyond AI output or translation speed. It measures the quality achieved, time spent, review effort, and cost required to produce an accepted final translation.

Quality findings

Accuracy, terminology, technical precision, and critical error observations.

Review-effort analysis

Corrections and expert-review effort required before acceptance.

Time and cost comparison

End-to-end turnaround and cost measures where comparable data exist.

Actionable recommendations

Where SesenGPT may help and where human-led controls remain essential.

Request Your Benchmark

SESENGPT BENCHMARK PROGRAM

Translation Performance Review

Illustrative report layout

Side-by-side findings based on your agreed evaluation criteria.

Evaluation area

Existing workflow

SesenGPT workflow

Translation quality

—

Terminology adherence

—

Numerical accuracy

—

Human review effort

—

Turnaround time

—

Total cost

—

Quality observations

Next-step recommendations

No results are shown. Actual findings depend on the agreed scope and available baseline information.

Evaluation Criteria

What We Measure

Regulated life sciences content requires more than fluent first drafts. The benchmark assesses technical accuracy, applicable regulatory content requirements, and the human review needed to reach the agreed final quality threshold.

Translation Accuracy & Quality

Review meaning, completeness, technical accuracy, and the severity of errors that matter to the intended use.

Terminology & Regulatory Relevance

Check approved scientific, product, and regulatory terminology and alignment with applicable content requirements.

Numerical & Technical Precision

Assess dosages, values, units, warnings, technical instructions, and content completeness.

Human Review & Correction Effort

Measure necessary edits, reviewer time, and rework needed to reach the agreed quality threshold.

Turnaround & Workflow Efficiency

Compare translation, review, corrections, and end-to-end delivery rather than raw processing speed.

Total Cost per Accepted Deliverable

Examine translation, linguistic review, corrections, and measurable internal review effort using comparable assumptions.

Fair comparisons, defined in advance. We agree on source content, language pairs, quality thresholds, reviewer roles, and evaluation methods. Where possible, both workflows are assessed with consistent materials and reviewers separate from translation production. Any differences or missing baseline data are disclosed in the findings.

How the SesenGPT Benchmark Works

A defined, four-step evaluation designed for informed translation decisions without a company-wide localization change.

STEP 01

Define Your Goals

Agree on representative documents, language pairs, quality requirements, and the measures that matter to your team.

STEP 02

Establish the Baseline

Identify comparable existing-workflow translations, language assets, review requirements, and available cost or time data.

STEP 03

Translate, Review & Measure

Evaluate SesenGPT output through controlled workflows and qualified linguistic review using agreed scoring criteria.

STEP 04

Review the Findings

Discuss the comparative results, any baseline limitations, and practical options for future translation workflows.

Start with representative content. Keep your current provider and operations in place while you evaluate alternative workflows.

Discuss an Evaluation

Life Sciences Specialization

Built for Clinical, Regulatory, and Technical Content

We tailor benchmark language pairs, terminology resources, qualified review, and quality criteria to each document's intended use and risk profile.

Clinical Trials & Research

Protocols, informed consent, investigator materials, patient communications, and study documentation.

Clinical Trial Translation Services

Regulatory Affairs & Submissions

Submission materials, health authority correspondence, CMC documentation, and controlled updates.

Regulatory Translation Services

Medical Devices & Diagnostics

IFUs and eIFUs, product labeling, technical documentation, device software, and interfaces.

Medical Device Translation Services

Controlled AI. Expert Review.

SesenGPT combines life sciences-adapted AI with approved language assets, medical linguist review, and structured quality assurance.

Approved terminology and translation memory

SesenGPT-assisted translation

Qualified medical linguist review

Validation and QA checks

A low-disruption way to evaluate.

No provider switch is required. Confidentiality requirements, secure transfer arrangements, access controls, and necessary agreements are established before samples are exchanged. Representative or de-identified content may be appropriate.

Explore the SesenGPT Platform

Benchmark Program FAQs

Practical answers about evaluation criteria, confidentiality, comparative data, and participation.

What is the SesenGPT Life Sciences Translation Benchmark Program?

It is a structured evaluation comparing SesenGPT-enabled translation with your existing workflow or agreed baseline using representative content, defined quality criteria, and available operational data.

Can we compare SesenGPT with our current translation provider?

Yes, when comparable source content, permitted reference translations, and baseline data are available. If a direct comparison is not possible, we can assess SesenGPT against agreed requirements and explain the limitations of the results.

What exactly will the benchmark measure?

Depending on scope, measures may include technical and linguistic accuracy, terminology adherence, critical errors, numerical precision, reviewer corrections, turnaround, and total cost per accepted deliverable. Criteria and quality thresholds are agreed before evaluation.

What will our team receive?

A findings summary covering the agreed performance measures, key quality observations, limitations in the available comparison, and recommendations for suitable next steps. The depth and format of the findings are determined with your team during scoping.

Which types of content and languages are eligible?

Representative clinical trial, regulatory, pharmaceutical, medical device, biotechnology, and digital health content may be evaluated. Sesen supports more than 150 languages; the benchmark language pairs are selected based on scope and available specialist resources.

How do you handle confidential or regulated information?

Before project materials are exchanged, we establish confidentiality needs, approved transfer methods, access controls, and necessary agreements. Representative or appropriately de-identified content may be used where suitable.

Do we have to change providers or replace human reviewers?

No. You can participate without replacing your current translation provider. Qualified medical and linguistic reviewers remain central to assessing final quality; the benchmark identifies where AI assistance may help and where more human oversight is required.

How is the benchmark different from a SesenGPT pilot?

The benchmark compares measurable translation results with an existing workflow or defined baseline. A pilot evaluates broader operational fit, workflows, and adoption possibilities. Both can inform future localization decisions. Explore the SesenGPT pilot.

How long does it take, and what does it cost?

The scope, schedule, deliverables, and commercial terms depend on document volume, complexity, language pairs, and review requirements. These are established with your team before work begins.

Start Your Evaluation

See How SesenGPT Measures Up

Bring a representative project, your current quality expectations, and the priorities you want to measure. Our life sciences team will help define a practical comparison.